View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 21:21
Bill_B Bill_B is offline
You cannot not make a difference
FRC #2170
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,099
Bill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ablatner View Post
One possible reason for limiting the perimeter to 112" is that at least one dimension will be 28" or less, allowing it to fit through doorways.
With bumpers on?

My first reaction to the smaller size was that the intent was to reduce the ease with which the pyramid to side wall passage could be blockaded. With a more open field, we may return to former robot sizing. I like the perimeter rule though. Just increase or decrease to fit the years' floorplan.
__________________
Nature's Fury FLL team 830 - F L eLements
FRC team 2170 - Titanium Tomahawks
Reply With Quote