View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 13:15
Squeakypig's Avatar
Squeakypig Squeakypig is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mike Coyle
FRC #2851 (Crevolution)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Sterling Heights, Michigan
Posts: 170
Squeakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond reputeSqueakypig has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Predictions Week 5: Ascending the Ranks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looking Forward View Post
[*]Three of the most revered names in Michigan will be competing at Troy, in HOT, the Thunder Chickens, and Las Guerillas. 67 and 217 will be looking to get their full court shooters on track after first events with finishes that did not live up their historical standards. HOT looks closer to their goals at this point, but it would be foolish to count out the team from Sterling Heights. 469's quick loading pyramid scoring machine could be the perfect compliment to either of them, and is favorite heading into the event. 68, 245, 2851, and 3539 will also be very dangerous, and it wouldn't be surprising at all to see an alliance with one of them knock out some of the bigger names. [*]With two districts already under their belts, it will be interesting to see if 2851 and 68 are more willing to take risks in order to win Troy. The Thunder Chickens, AdamBots, and Las Guerillas (while safe bets to reach MSC) need to accumulate points where they can in order to guarantee themselves a spot in St. Louis. [/list]
You are correct, one of our main goals at Troy is to make some waves. I would watch out for the high score of the season if by chance 67, 469, and 3539 get on the same alliance...very plausible in quals.
__________________

Reply With Quote