Thanks Ed & Ether for this great resource.
However I do need to quibble about how OPR/CCWM is being discussed, as exemplified by several earlier posts. Picking one of these:
Quote:
Originally Posted by efoote868
Summary of global OPR and CCWM match win/loss predictions: 81.72% and 82.47% respectively.
|
Those numbers are misleading since OPR/CCWM are calculated from the same data which are being used to test their predictive power, i.e. the training & test sets are the same.
It's analogous to (although not as extreme as) stating that final qualification ranking is a good
predictor of the performance in earlier qualifying matches. Whereas obviously qualification ranking is a
consequence of performance in earlier matches.
Good practice would use disjoint training and testing sets. I'm sure this analysis has been performed in previous seasons but I didn't see it from a brief search of CD.
Interestingly the simple baseline heuristic of "alliance with lower team numbers" has 59.1% predictive power for qualification matches this season. I'm assume that OPR and CCWM are better than that, but not as good as the ~82% claimed above.