View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-04-2013, 08:56
DELurker DELurker is offline
Former Engineering Mentor
AKA: William Lydick
no team (n/a)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Delaware, US
Posts: 268
DELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant future
Re: OPR after Week Five Events

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Does not predict 100%. But its correlation with match win/loss outcomes is unarguably statistically significant (witness earlier posts in this thread), and it is one among many useful scouting tools.
True. Assuming that nothing changes from previous form, the OPR and CCWM can be very good indicators of probable results. However, there is an implicit error function on the numbers (otherwise, they would be 100% in the absence of meaningful changes). In addition, any team that knows they are on the short end of the statistics and does not try for a change in their favor is doing themselves a disservice.

I suppose that what I am trying to lead to is that the OPR and CCWM numbers are very useful tools (we use them a lot), but they only indicate based on the assumption that nothing will change from previous matches.
__________________
----------------------------------------------
With 1370 --
2012 Rutgers District Event Champions with 1676/56
2012 Lenape District Event Finalists with 2191/1691

2013 TCNJ District Event QuarterFinalists with 1143/4750, Gracious Professionalism Award
2013 Bridgewater-Raritan District Event Semi-Finalists with 4285/223
2013 MAR Championship Finalists (Backup) with 222/11/1403; Gracious Professionalism Award
Reply With Quote