View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-04-2013, 13:46
billbo911's Avatar
billbo911 billbo911 is offline
I prefer you give a perfect effort.
AKA: That's "Mr. Bill"
FRC #2073 (EagleForce)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Elk Grove, Ca.
Posts: 2,355
billbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sensors Not Required: FRC Design "Sans Feedback"

Michael,
I for one, truly appreciate the simplicity and reliability approach 1662 has taken over the years. Your success alone is a great testament to it's effectiveness.

That said, if we look at what a "Robot" is: "A robot is a mechanical or virtual artificial agent, usually an electro-mechanical machine that is guided by a computer program or electronic circuitry. Robots can be autonomous, semi-autonomous or remotely controlled...." Wikipedia. Or my "definition": "A electromechanical device that operates and reacts to it's environment based on programming and sensor input.". It seems apparent that sensors are a major part of a "robot". If we neglect to take advantage of their input, are we really teaching robotics.

Please don't get me wrong, robotics is such a huge field that having a focus on the mechanics and less on the sensors is just a valid as any other approach. The last thing I would want to suggest is that 1662 should change their approach.

What I would like to suggest is that you take time in the off season and start experimenting with sensors that you feel you might benefit from. My first suggestion would be to start with quadrature encoders, limit switches, and potentiometers.

Please feel free to contact 2073, EagleForce, if you would like any help with this.
__________________
CalGames 2009 Autonomous Champion Award winner
Sacramento 2010 Creativity in Design winner, Sacramento 2010 Quarter finalist
2011 Sacramento Finalist, 2011 Madtown Engineering Inspiration Award.
2012 Sacramento Semi-Finals, 2012 Sacramento Innovation in Control Award, 2012 SVR Judges Award.
2012 CalGames Autonomous Challenge Award winner ($$$).
2014 2X Rockwell Automation: Innovation in Control Award (CVR and SAC). Curie Division Gracious Professionalism Award.
2014 Capital City Classic Winner AND Runner Up. Madtown Throwdown: Runner up.
2015 Innovation in Control Award, Sacramento.
2016 Chezy Champs Finalist, 2016 MTTD Finalist