View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-04-2013, 13:50
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,669
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Sensors Not Required: FRC Design "Sans Feedback"

We try to eliminate sensors as much as possible, but sometimes they are useful. We have basically only used limit switches and encoders, though this year we used an IR sensor.

2013: Open loop shooter speed control. Because the discs slip on the shooter wheels repeatably, and because discs fly into the goal on the "upward" part of the trajectory, this works just fine.

We used an encoder + limit switch on our arm almost exclusively for autonomous mode. Probably could have used a pot, but meh. Arm goes down, zeros on the limit switch, goes up until we hit our preset encoder count, fires. This style of arm and shooter could have been done completely without sensors using pneumatics, but we liked being able to use the camera and a drawn crosshair to shoot from anywhere we wanted, so we made an aimable arm.

For our disc path, a limit switch and IR sensor would help us detect what state the hopper was in.

2012: Only sensor was our shooter wheel encoder. We had something resembling PID working for our offseasons, but it wasn't stellar. Software isnt' our strong suit.

2011: Zero sensor feedback. Robot was a pretty crappy arm-bot that we have all tried to forget since. Set points would have been nice.

2010: Zero sensor feedback. Robot was basically just an 8WD base with a piston kicker and a suction cup. There was no need.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)