View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-04-2013, 14:42
DELurker DELurker is offline
Former Engineering Mentor
AKA: William Lydick
no team (n/a)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Delaware, US
Posts: 268
DELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant futureDELurker has a brilliant future
Re: OPR after Week Six Events

Our team has been looking at the OPR and CCWM data and we are coming away from it slightly confused. Hopefully, someone here (Ed? Ether?) can help me to understand it so that I can explain it to the rest of the team in a marginally coherent manner. Oh, wait ...

At TCNJ, we played an OK game and came away with a OPR of 22.3 and CCWM of 6.2 (both rounded to 1 decimal place via Excel). At Bridgewater, we played tremendously better (or so it felt) and our winning margin rose from 3.4 to 3.9 (+14.7%) and our average score rose from 19.6 to 24.1 (+23.0%), although our OPR dropped 0.5% (22.3 -> 22.2) and our CCWM went down 11 points to -5.0

If we're scoring better, more accurately, and more often while winning more matches, wouldn't our CCWM and OPR go up?
__________________
----------------------------------------------
With 1370 --
2012 Rutgers District Event Champions with 1676/56
2012 Lenape District Event Finalists with 2191/1691

2013 TCNJ District Event QuarterFinalists with 1143/4750, Gracious Professionalism Award
2013 Bridgewater-Raritan District Event Semi-Finalists with 4285/223
2013 MAR Championship Finalists (Backup) with 222/11/1403; Gracious Professionalism Award
Reply With Quote