Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyCarl92
How about awarding teams something like 4 or 5 pts. for eliminations victories in addition to selection points? This would not solve the problem in your example, but it would bring the results closer to reality:
Alliance 2 has 6 wins in elims totaling 6*5 = 30 pts.
Alliance 1 has 4 wins in elims (2 from QF, 2 from SF, 0 from F) totaling 4*5 = 20 pts.
Alliance 3 has 3 wins in elims (2 from QF, 1 from SF) totaling 3*5 = 15 pts.
|
This seems fairer in that it takes into account the "closeness" of a round in elims by giving partial credit to an alliance that forces a third match, but without penalizing the winning alliance.
Kim's data suggests that there is a rank correlation of about 0.69 between World OPR and NE proposal points, which is worse than I expected.
But since OPR is far from a perfect ranking measure, and we know there are problems with projecting NE district points from non-normalized Regional results, it's probably not a particularly useful measurement anyway!