Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber
You're right, I added the words morons because I was thinking it. My apologies. I'll edit the post.
So you like he idea of a Top25 but not the idea of the uninformed voting on it. How would you suggest ranking them? Numeric methods probably won't work due to differences in regional strengths. Finding a group of "informed" won't work since there's no real defined qualification.
|
In 2011 a coaches poll was run side by side with the public poll. I forget who all the coaches were, but this concept worked and both top 25's were displayed.
It'd also be awesome to implement a pure statistical top25 w/ FIM style points that are standardized to cover different # of matches played.
If a public, coach, and statistical ranking were done, a combined ranking of the three could also be done.