View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-04-2013, 17:10
Michael Hill's Avatar
Michael Hill Michael Hill is offline
Registered User
FRC #3138 (Innovators Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,573
Michael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Methods of shifting gears

Quote:
Originally Posted by MICHAELABICK View Post
The question is if the extra weight is worth the extra performance. Pneumatics means faster and more reliable(imo because there is little chance to shear a dog gear) shifts. In addition to that, pneumatics can be very useful for simple, 2 position operations, can be used as springs, and can be actuated after the buzzer. This gives pneumatics tremendous versatility. I personally think pneumatics gives enough benefit to outweigh the price.
I realize that. I've used pneumatics on every robot I've been associated with building. I've just seen a lot of teams staying away from pneumatics because of either difficulty or weight.