View Single Post
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-04-2013, 20:40
TheMadCADer TheMadCADer is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 218
TheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant futureTheMadCADer has a brilliant future
Re: [FRCTop25.com] Final Rankings Show!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErvinI View Post
For reference's sake, here's a comparison between their Max OPR Rank and their FRCTop25 rank:

Top 25---- Max OPR Rank (Average OPR Rank)

25. 1334--- 22 (50)
24. 2169--- 19 (8)
23. 624--- 7 (24)
22. 1806--- 24 (12)
21. 11---- 46 (21)
20. 1718--- 45 (39)
19. 2590--- 9 (18)
18. 341--- 284 (266)
17. 1310--- 65 (37)
16. 111--- 21 (29)
15. 868--- 10 (6)
14. 1477--- 11 (49)
13. 359--- 18 (16)
12. 148--- 20 (46)
11. 67--- 15 (32)
10. 610--- 33 (38)
9. 1717--- 6 (17)
8. 33--- 16 (10)
7. 469--- 3 (4)
6. 987--- 4 (3)
5. 118--- 5 (5)
4. 254--- 13 (23)
3. 1986--- 8 (7)
2. 2056--- 2 (1)
1. 1114--- 1 (2)

Max OPR reference: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=65
Additionally, here's pretty much the same thing, but with CCWM instead of OPR.
Code:
Top 25----    Max CCWM Rank (Average CCWM Rank)                  

 25. 1334---       39  (100)	
 24. 2169---       32  (12)
 23. 624---        7   (19)
 22. 1806---       18  (8)		
 21. 11----        33  (26)
 20. 1718---       44  (36)
 19. 2590---       41  (38)
 18. 341---        265 (254)
 17. 1310---       344 (337)		
 16. 111---        20  (32)
 15. 868---        34  (11)
 14. 1477---       6   (33)
 13. 359---        8   (13)
 12. 148---        40  (60)
 11. 67---         26  (35)
 10. 610---        27  (23)
 9.  1717---       14  (22)
 8.  33---         17  (25)
 7.  469---        9   (5)
 6.  987---        4   (6)
 5.  118---        5   (7)
 4.  254---        66  (39)
 3.  1986--        3   (4)
 2.  2056---       1   (1)
 1.  1114---       2   (2)
Source.

Also, I think there is an error in the data for 341 and 1310. Those numbers just don't make sense (average > max).

Last edited by TheMadCADer : 11-04-2013 at 20:43.
Reply With Quote