|
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically
The best way to ensure that each team plays to win every match is to ensure that the seeding system rewards that behavior. Qualifying points based on wins and ties with tie breaker points based on a team's own alliance performance (not the opposing one's) should do that.
This is the system in place for this year. The remaining incentive which may influence behavior is the draft process. In my opinion, drafting 1 to 8 in both rounds would remove any incentive for a team to "throw" a match.
Under these circumstances, I cannot think of an ethical (or even gray area) which would justify a team "throwing" a match.
|