|
Re: A "Dangerous Situation"
Quote:
Originally Posted by DjScribbles
That seems like a pretty reasonable conclusion, given what you said was called later; I don't know what words were traded on the field but their is plenty of room for misinterpreting/describing the scenario we were asking about.
The answer we got back changed the way we played qf1-2, since racking up tech-fouls would be no way to win a match, hopefully we can get a better understanding at CMP, I'm happy that it sounds like this is already on the radar.
We had a great time regardless, and I hope we gave you a run for your money 
|
I agree. I'd love to be able to know exactly what we and the defense can and can't do, then we can develop our strategy based on those rulings.
Yes you did! I was suprised how many shots you guys were able to block with just a little pole. It was more than I would have hoped.
You guys have a good machine. Your autonomous ability had you very high on our list. Had we declined 2054, we suspected you would be our first selection from the #3 or #4 spot, depending on the other picks.
__________________
2005 FIRST World Champions (330, 67, 503)
2009 FIRST World Champions (111, 67, 971)
2010 FIRST World Champions (294, 67, 177)
|