View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-01-2003, 22:48
Kyle Fenton Kyle Fenton is offline
GET IT ON!!
FRC #0121 (Rhode Warrior)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Middletown, R.I.
Posts: 785
Kyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud ofKyle Fenton has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Kyle Fenton
Quote:
Originally posted by reisser
Ok I just spent the time to do an image quality vs. compression test with all of quicktime's supported codecs and DivX. I think we all know the benefits of DivX well so I will leave that out of here. The codec that had the least artifacts, ailiasing, and other unwanted stuff while still having a very manageable file size was, in fact, the video codec. I urge you to try this experiment yourself. You should be pleasantly surprised by its performance. As for audio, I would like to hear some of your expert suggestions on that. Usually I would do PCM due to lack of expertise.
-Brandon
The Video Codec is a very old codec, it was primarily used 5 to 8 years ago. Its kind of obsolete. The best Image Quality to kilobytes/sec ratio is either MPEG-4 or Sorenson 3.


If you see the picture I recently posted up on top, If you click settings, you get another window giving you a bunch of options like quality, fps, etc. If you put those to Max qualities, you will see a much better picture, and also a higher bit rate.

DIVX is ok, not great though. It is a variant of the MPEG-4 Standard that does not comply with the ISMA (Internet Streaming Media Alliance) standard. The only reason DIVX took off, is because of its the #1 format for P2P networks for downloading DVD's.