Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg
If being from a HoF team immediately makes your posts Word of God, then I guess I'm uninformed.
Bear in mind that his point was not to reduce the number of teams for the sake of event logistics or increased number of matches, it was purely because he felt that teams were being "cheated" out of their "rightful seed" because they had the terrible experience of being paired with a team that isn't "elite!" Oh, the horror!
This clique-y nonsense has no place in a competition whose ostensible goal is to spread interest in STEM, and I don't particularly care who it's coming from. Neither should you. If you find the idea of a FIRST in which a small number of "elite" teams get to compete in nationals more appealing than a large number of not-so-"elite" teams, simply because you value the competition more than the engineering, then I contend that you do not understand the point of FIRST, no matter how prestigious your background. Get off your high horse and realize that FIRST is not about winning the tournament, nor has it ever been, nor should it ever be.
|
You completely missed the point why it is unfair to teams attending. I think I know pretty well that it meant more teams does mean an unfair set of qualification matches due to the number of teams attending. The quality of matches can go down and rankings are not perfectly accurate. Please don't put words in people's mouths.