
29-04-2013, 15:55
|
 |
 |
Registered User
 FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Berkeley/San Diego
Posts: 601
|
|
|
Re: Ungracious professionalism at internationals?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce Paputa
THIS IS MY OPINION, NOT MY TEAM'S.
tl;dr: 1538 may have picked 217 over us to increase their chance of winning chairmans.
There is another factor not being considered, chairmans. I personally believe that 217 told the first seed alliance not to pick them, and did it strongly. 217 was 2 and 6, in 81st place, there was not much reason (that I can see) to pick them, however they ended up picking them anyways. They had 2 amazing floor pick ups and a great climber, they needed someone to get discs to them quickly, likely a FCS. The curie high score was set by 1538 and us, a FCS. They picked 217 for their FCS, in the one match i watched, they got 15 discs out and made 4 of them. I personally (not my team's opinion, just mine) think that they may have chose them over us because of chairmans, if they had picked us, we would've likely won the division, and possibly more. We have a very strong chairmans team, but this year and quite a few prior, we have not been anywhere near as good robot-wise as 1538, 1114 and the prior winners. If they had picked us, and we had got to Einstein and further, the chairman's award would've been even closer than I'm sure it already was. I have no idea if this was actually their logic, but I can't find another reason for them to pick 217 over us. Anyways, Thanks for that fun 8th match, 1538.
|
To my knowledge, Chairman's is decided Friday night and only egregious behavior from a team on Saturday would change the decision. Don't quote me on that. I can say for certain, however, that we did not take Chairman's into account when picking 217.
__________________
Team 973 (2016-???)
Team 5499 (2015-2016)
Team 254 (2014-2015)
Team 1538 (2011-2014) 2014 Driver (25W 17L 1T)
日本語でOK
|