View Single Post
  #179   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2013, 18:24
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,050
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2013 Lessons Learned: The Negative

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalTran View Post
3. What would your definition of a "more reasonable field element" be?
Something with a similarly difficult design challenge that one could reasonably expect the average FRC team to be able to simulate with reasonable closeness to the actual field object for testing purposes, and whose reward in game scoring accurately reflects the engineering difficulty.

This is not asking overly much. In fact, as I mentioned, the pyramid itself probably could have been this with a few changes to construction and game scoring.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote