View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-05-2013, 10:53
MikeE's Avatar
MikeE MikeE is offline
Wrecking nice beaches since 1990
no team (Volunteer)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New England -> Alaska
Posts: 381
MikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Dominant teams who are not as dominant as they used to be

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Holley View Post
IMO this thread is in bad taste.

I am fine with pointing out teams who have ok performances in the past and really stepped up in the past few years. However, going the other direction seems rude and a bit unnecessary.

Teams peak and valley for numerous reasons. I'm sure any team who may fit into this category is aware of their current performance versus their legacy.


Just my $.02 on the matter.


-Brando
I see your point but there are lessons to be learned from teams following both trajectories.

If this thread offers the opportunity for teams to offer up their stories of why robot competitiveness has decreased, then the community can benefit from this information.

However "nominating" teams that others perceive have declined is definitely too disrespectful for my tastes.
Reply With Quote