View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-05-2013, 17:38
nikeairmancurry's Avatar
nikeairmancurry nikeairmancurry is offline
FF - TeamSuperPowerMatic
AKA: Nicholas
FRC #0313
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 841
nikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond reputenikeairmancurry has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Corner Climbing, The best strategy of 2013?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cash4587 View Post
Correct, but then again the 1114 118 alliance in Galileo had the highest score out of any alliance at champs. If 1114 would have had the time to fix their climber before Galileo finals so it didn't stick, they most likely would have won champs. 1114 and 118 were cyclers as well they just had problems keeping them from moving onto Einstein.
I wouldn't say any team was most likely to win champs. If you remember 469/33 was consider by most a shoe-in to win it all before the finals started.

On topic now...

For climbing, I do not believe there was a "best" strategy. It was more about the room you had on your robot. 254/1986 robots were very fast at climbing along the faces. 67/1114 were fast at climbing the corners.

The one difference I see is that 254/1986 did not give up the ability to pick up off the floor with the face climbing, while 1114/67 did with corner climbing.
__________________
Team Member- 326 2006-2009
Team Mentor- 326 2010-2013
Team Mentor- 313/5220 2014-??


Reply With Quote