View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-06-2013, 21:13
mman1506's Avatar
mman1506 mman1506 is online now
Hater of Tiny Molex Connectors
AKA: Marcus Quintilian
no team (WARP7)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 806
mman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1114 Inspired Chasis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred View Post
From the looks of the prototype they showed, it doesn't look like a big sacrifice.

I would imagine the outward-bent flange is to define their FRAME PERIMETER and provide a mount for the box, since their hard parts can't extend more than an inch beyond the FRAME PERIMETER (under 2013 rules, mind).

Considering the AndyMark C-Base is 1.13" wide (and you can't really mount things on the outer face with the present frame perimeter rules), I doubt it's much of a loss of usable space. If you needed to mount something on the outer flange, I believe you could still hog out part of the box tubing on the upper face to provide room for a bolt or rivet. How much strength you give for that I'll leave to the pros.
I'm guessing that it will stay the same (2013 bot does not have a flange) as the robot perimeter is measured without the bumpers.

Since bumpers are measured on there own, the 2" box tube would be measured as the attachment device.

I would like to see someone from team 33 to chime in on this manner.
__________________
2014-2015: FRC 865 Warp7 Team Captain
2016: FRC 865 Mentor

2017: Free Agent Mentor, Inspector

Last edited by mman1506 : 11-06-2013 at 21:33.
Reply With Quote