View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2013, 19:36
the.miler's Avatar
the.miler the.miler is offline
taking a break
AKA: Miles Chan
FRC #0846 (Funky Monkeys)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 71
the.miler is a glorious beacon of lightthe.miler is a glorious beacon of lightthe.miler is a glorious beacon of lightthe.miler is a glorious beacon of lightthe.miler is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Live Axle vs Dead Axle

It depends a lot on what sort of resources you have. We have easy access to a Tormach pCNC 1100 in our room on campus, and less easy access to a sheet metal shop with laser cutting capability. The choice is simple; we do a cantilevered style live axle drive train with chain tensioning that works by swapping in different sized idler sprockets between our wheels. We CNC the side members of our drivetrain and the bumper standoffs out of tube (2"x1" generally, sometimes 1.5"x1" if we can get away with it).



Since reliability is, above all else, most important to us, we run direct drive to the wheels. One more chain run is one more chain run to tension, and one additional point of failure that could cripple an entire side of the drivetrain. We achieved our desired reduction entirely through the design of custom gearboxes and machining the side plates on our CNC (not a difficult endeavor with an in house machine). 16 ft/sec served us well this year.

If you have access to sheet metal resources, I would consider making something sweet and lightweight like Team 33's WASP drive; the use of the bumper rules to allow a lighter weight frame but heavier duty bumpers is very cool.
__________________
Member 846 The Funky Monkeys 2010-2014

Team 846 Highlights 2014
lynbrookrobotics.com
becauserobots.org

Last edited by the.miler : 16-06-2013 at 19:44. Reason: rephrase for clarity