View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-06-2013, 12:36
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: gearbox calculator

You would gain low-end torque at the expense of torque above ~1350rpm in that scenario.

I guess it depends on where you want to optimize torque. For driveability you would want more midrange torque, which three motors geared the same will provide more of than your solution.

If you shift at the right time, you could get a much nicer torque curve through accel and driving.

Illustration:
green is torque curve with 2.2:1 reduction (ball shifter shift spread) with 3 CIM input
dark blue is your proposed torque curve (2 CIM 1:1 plus 1 CIM 3:1 when torque output from that CIM is >0)
yellow is torque curve with 1:1 reduction (3 CIM 1:1)
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...d=13714870 18

Mechanically shifting ends up switching between the green and yellow curves at the intersection (ideally), which will ALWAYS lead to more output torque than the blue curve.

Mechanically shifting is the answer.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cimtorque1.png
Views:	41
Size:	23.1 KB
ID:	14990  
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack