Thread: Elevator Design
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-06-2013, 14:07
DampRobot's Avatar
DampRobot DampRobot is offline
Physics Major
AKA: Roger Romani
FRC #0100 (The Wildhats) and FRC#971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Stanford University
Posts: 1,277
DampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Elevator Design

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
McMaster has all the surgical tubing you'd need, but it's subpar as your force drops off as soon as you start lifting and the carriage will only be partially supported. Constant force springs are much better. I know 1717 used a device in 2011 that integrated a constant force spring into a box with a cable that extended/retracted. I think they were called "pull boxes", though as I recall it they were only good for up to 6 lbf or so.
I know 846 used one of these integrated tool balancer constant force spring assemblies in 2011. They're distributed via SDP-SI, and should have enough oomph to counterbalance an elevator. However, they are a tad expensive.
__________________
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be lighted.

-Plutarch