View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-07-2013, 18:26
PVCpirate's Avatar
PVCpirate PVCpirate is offline
FRC Data Nerd
AKA: Anthony Jennings
FRC #1058 (PVC Pirates)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Londonderry NH
Posts: 669
PVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud ofPVCpirate has much to be proud of
Re: Official: New England Districts in 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kims Robot View Post
If this were the case, there would be no incentive for NE to go to districts. Why do more work just to lose WCMP slots for your teams?? Like I said, read the NE blog. I'm fairly certain there would be a riot if we got fewer than 30 slots
I have been keeping up with all thing NEFIRST, the FRC blog, and anything else vaguely district related, and I have formed an opinion based on what I know. If you know additional information that is not available to me, then of course you would have a different opinion. The blog post you are referring to is from January, and it is my understanding that the situation isn't exactly the same now as it was then. From the FRC blog post announcing the NE and Northwest districts, it seems like FIRST is trying to standardize all districts, and I think it should extend to Championship slots as well.

Furthermore, I think that the number of slots for each district system should be calculated in the same way, so if you are correct about NE getting 30, which you very well may be, I would disagree with that decision.
__________________
My accomplishments with 1058:
2010 - Granite State Regoinal Winners, Galileo quarterfinalists, IRI quarterfinalists
2012 - GSR Chairman's Award winners
An incredible four years I will never forget
Reply With Quote