View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-07-2013, 21:57
Pault's Avatar
Pault Pault is offline
Registered User
FRC #0246 (Overclocked)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 618
Pault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond reputePault has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Official: New England Districts in 2014

Yea, I was partly referring to the 2nd pick, which I kind of agree doesn't simply luck out, they have to play well once they get onto that winning alliance in order to make it win. But in 9/10 cases, they are just an average robot at a competition who found themselves in a good place and did what they needed to do.

The other part is rookie allstar. Sometimes, they are really a great team that deserved the award and to go to champs. But other times, they just happened to go to a competition with few/no other rookies, and didn't necessarily do anything special to win the award.

Also, when I said 15 of mostly the best teams, I was implying that sometimes the regional model leaves out some really good teams (every year we see the "best teams who didn't make champs" thread). But from what I understand from the district model, this happens far less often.

So I might of exaggerated a little bit when I said that. It's probably more along the lines of 22 teams who are mostly the best and 8 who are either average or lucky. Still worse in my opinion than 25 of the best teams. But I know other people have other opinions on it, and with good reasons to back their opinions, so I respect whatever disagreement people may have with this.
Reply With Quote