|
Re: FRC Blogged - What Do You Think? The ‘Invite to Decline’ Strategy
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH
I'd go with an IRI (1-8, 1-8, 8-1) or full serpentine (1-8, 8-1, 1-8) where yet another set of backup rules were adopted. I forget the offseason event, but their rule is that the backup robot must play at least ONCE in the eliminations. If you're 1 match from elimination and your backup hasn't played, you have to play them; otherwise, whoever you want to goes out there.
|
The only problem i could see with a system like this is that you would then have 7 robots qualifying at each event, which wouldn't be an issue if champs weren't already cramped as it is
__________________
2013 - Greater Kansas City: Regional Winners (1986, 2457), Judges Award; Oklahoma City: Regional Winners (1986, 2389)
2012 - Oklahoma City: Innovation in Control Award
2011-10,000 Lakes: Dean's List Finalist , Coopratition Award
2010 - St. Louis: Regional Finalists (1098, 1329)
2009 - Greater Kansas City: Regional Winners (1208, 931), General Motors Industrial Design Award; St. Louis Regional: General Motors Industrial Design Award
2008 - Greater Kansas City: Regional Winners (476, 1802), Johnson & Johnson Gracious Professionalism Award; Oklahoma: Regional Winners (2165, 2354), Motorola Quality Award
|