|
Re: Standardized District Point Model
I definitely welcome a standardized point model- even though it may take away some of the flexibility and customization some people were looking forward to with a district model.
I believe it is important to maintain qualification and performance based on the same metrics wherever we can. As someone stated above- I could see a huge point of contention being slight differences district to district that cause teams to qualify/not qualify for whatever reason.
The task force (I assume there is one) that is currently trying to bake up a standardized points system does not have an easy job, and I do not envy them. I do feel however, this work will go a long way to 'reconnecting' the districts into the mainstream of FRC by tying them (loosely for now) to each other.
-Brando
__________________
MORT (Team 11) '01-'05 :
-2005 New Jersey Regional Chairman's Award Winners
-2013 MORT Hall of Fame Inductee
NUTRONs (Team 125) '05-???
2007 Boston Regional Winners
2008 & 2009 Boston Regional Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
2010 Boston Regional Creativity Award
2011 Bayou Regional Finalists, Innovation in Control Award, Boston Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award
2012 New York City Regional Winners, Boston Regional Finalists, IRI Mentor of the Year
2013 Orlando Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award, Boston Regional Winners, Pine Tree Regional Finalists
2014 Rhode Island District Winners, Excellence in Engineering Award, Northeastern University District Winners, Industrial Design Award, Pine Tree District Chairman's Award, Pine Tree District Winners
2015 South Florida Regional Chairman's Award, NU District Winners, NEDCMP Industrial Design Award, Hopper Division Finalists, Hopper/Newton Gracious Professionalism Award
|