View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-08-2013, 15:01
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,795
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Stepper Driver to CIM

My point is that the accuracy of the CIM motor is dependent on the brush spacing and the size of the brush assy. The CIM has approximately 6 distinct positions (steps) per rotation or 60 degrees +/- 90 degrees per step (based on the brush contacting two commutator segments +/- 1 segment). In a rough calculation using the above example of 100:1 reduction, the per step accuracy of the CIM would produce about 0.0004" +/- 0.0006" per step at the output of the lead screw or 0.1" +/-0.25" for 1 rotation of the lead screw, worse case. The 1.8 degree stepper as shown above will produce as described 0.0005" +/- 0.00002" per step or 0.1" +/-0.004" per rotation, worse case. While it is possible to produce better accuracy in the CIM in a closed loop configuration and with higher reduction ratios, there is a diminishing return on investment. This example does not take into account the accuracy of angular position within a 100:1 transmission and assumes it to be infinitely accurate.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.