View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-09-2013, 21:10
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 734
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Re: Pocketing Gussets

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadandcookies View Post
See, this is the part that I'm a little bit fuzzy on-- I'm well aware that triangles are the (logical) strongest shape to use, but what I'm iffy on is whether there's a significant increase in strength in FRC-specific applications. MY team has always approached it with the view of "we have limited machine time and expertise, and our rectangles haven't broken yet."

We may have to experiment with this during the fall...
The best method we have found is to use thinner material/wall. On thicker parts we resort to lightening on a waterjet(thinner material still costs less and takes more time, so that is default regardless of the fact that we waterjet all our gussets).
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html

Last edited by MichaelBick : 01-09-2013 at 21:12.