Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
This seems to be a good point in the discussion where I can add something JVN posted a while back in a similar thread. It was something to the effect of "We will never vote on a design. Voting is not an engineering decision making process."
I agree completely with that, and not everyone should have an equal say, or even a say at all.
If you look at how some of the most successful teams operate, you'll notice that they often have one person driving the design, from big picture to minute detail. They can delegate the work, but they are beginning with the end in mind, and know what the whole thing should look like before any of it is CAD modeled or built. These individuals are often mentors with many years experience in FIRST, and they have often closely studied the successes of others.
|
I'm curious about how you would reply to people who would say that this method fails to engage students at a higher level? That is to say that if a mentor is managing the big picture, it robs students from getting a chance to weigh into major decisions.
For some teams that operate on the principal of "student built; student designed," the aforementioned structure seems to challenge the very foundations of some teams.
- Sunny G.