View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-09-2013, 07:29
Nate Laverdure's Avatar
Nate Laverdure Nate Laverdure is offline
Registered User
FRC #2363
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 831
Nate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Motors/Gearboxes required to move a 20 kg/44 lb robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchVince View Post
I can't seem to find a way to support the shaft of the VersaPlanetaries, though. The shaft is too short o get a wheel and a support on.
If you really feel like you need to support the cantilevered shaft, you could add an additional hub to the outside face of each wheel (on the opposite side from the existing hub). You could increase the hub bore to fit a bushing which could ride on an additional cantilevered shaft fixed to the robot frame.

HOWEVER-- This design is poor because it requires all of the elements (hub bolt pattern, hub bore, bushing OD & ID, shaft) to be accurately placed on the axis of the versaplanetary. Stresses from misalignment of any of these things would be taken up (at least partly) in the gearbox.

EDIT-- or you could press a bearing into the opposite side of the wheel and have that ride on a fixed shaft. That would eliminate a number of uncertainties from the tolerance stackup. My point still stands about accurately locating the fixed shaft relative to the versaplanetary axis, though.

Last edited by Nate Laverdure : 04-09-2013 at 07:55. Reason: Drink coffee first, THEN post to CD