View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-09-2013, 20:36
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,753
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Network Tables Rev. 2.0 Questions

1. There is no delete. It actually persists if the server or a client holds onto the value.
2. I agree that the spec is loose. I chose to reassign and let the latest win. This can even happen with updates.
3. Yes
4. The LV implementation seems to limit it to 255 elements. This is done at the update transfer. So local arrays could technically be larger, but wouldn't transfer to the other client/server(s). Similarly, string size is limited to a two byte integer.

Greg McKaskle