Thread: Network Tables Rev. 2.0 Questions
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-09-2013, 18:53
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,753
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Network Tables Rev. 2.0 Questions
I don't believe that should happen. LV looks up the fully qualified name in the map and retrieves the field ID. If we wanted, we could add the type to the name and allow for a number, a Boolean, and a String with the same name. My interp of the spec was that if the name matches, it can change type and value and it would be better to have only one field with a given name. I can't speak as confidently of the Java implementation.

Greg McKaskle