View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2013, 08:19
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,753
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Network Tables Rev. 2.0 Questions

I know how it goes. I must have asked the WPI folks twenty questions while implementing the LV one. And I'm typically telling you what the implementation does because honestly it is quicker for me to read than the spec.

So, in the same vein, for the LV implementation, the client takes the value update from the server no matter what, but the server takes client updates only if they have a newer seq#. Local updates increment the sequence number and protocol updates don't. The assignments are basically the same, but they don't ever increment.

Greg McKaskle