View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-09-2013, 12:19
joelg236 joelg236 is offline
4334 Retired Mentor & Alumni
AKA: Joel Gallant
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 733
joelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Preferred Code License for FRC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightpool View Post
Please don't. These licenses are constructed the way they are for a reason, and made by lawyers who know what they're doing. Adding a clause that restricts the usage of the software goes directly against the FSF's Four Fundamental Freedoms:

Additionally, there are a lot of loopholes in a license like what was recommended, specifically that it is self-contradictory, as the GPL explicitly permits commercial use, and that you never define what constitutes commercial use, so its ambiguous.
For example, one of the terms of the CC-BY-NC license that covers commercial use:

As you can see, its a little more complicated then "you can't use it for commercial software"
I can see where you're coming from. Honestly, there is no way an FRC team has the lawyers to properly do this though. The clause would just be there as a signal, it's not much legal protection.

And anyways, what kind of corporation would use FRC code? And what for?
__________________
All opinions are my own.