View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2013, 13:53
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,040
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: Drivetrain Acceleration Model

Quote:
Originally Posted by IKE View Post
For rolling resistance, this gives a constant coefficient and a v^2 coefficient.
I'm glad you brought this up.

I structured the code to make it very simple to change the rolling resistance model if you want to. It takes only 2 keystrokes to change the rolling resistance model from
L = Kro+Krv*V; (line #68 in the 9/19/2013_1112a code)
to
L = Kro+Krv*V*V;
In fact, you could make the rolling resistance any function of V, or even use a look-up table if you have experimental data.

However, I think the V*V term only comes into play due to air resistance at speeds much higher than FRC robot speeds. It would be enlightening to see some actual data of rolling resistance vs speed for a typical FRC robot (with drivetrain mechanically disengaged from wheels) on FRC carpet surface.





Last edited by Ether : 21-09-2013 at 19:59. Reason: typo. thanks guys
Reply With Quote