|
Re: FRC Blogged - Frank Answers Fridays: September 20, 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by dag0620
It's not hard to believe FIRST could solve this at all. Is there an easy fix? Yes. Should it be fixed? No.
When it comes down to it, this is a choice of NASA to put this on, and has nothing to do with HQ wanting a monetary attachment to the award. NASA being an American Agency has every right to look out for American interests above another. This is their choice, and it is not FIRST HQ's job to intervene and level the playing field.
There will always be advantages some teams have over others, just as it is in the real world. Just as much as we try our hardest to make borders not exist, in the real world they are still a factor you have to work around. When trying to secure a contract, especially with governments, you bet where your company and workforce is located against where your competitors are plays a huge factor in whether you are awarded the contract or not.
|
But each company is compared based and competes on the same standards set forth by the one offering the contract.
I'm not arguing the teams' resources but those given to teams by Main FIRST Sponsors. If teams want the chance to win/company wants the chance to win the contract, then everyone needs to be offered the same reward for winning EI/each company should be held to the same standards.
__________________
1592(Student and Mentor) 2007-2012
Blue Banners: 2008 Colorado, 2012 Orlando, 2012 South Florida, 2014 Orlando, 2015 Buckeye
Mechanical Engineering - University of Central Florida(Class of 2016)
|