View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-10-2013, 08:54
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,869
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sonic or Ball Shifter?

Full disclosure: I haven't used either in a robot (yet) but recently made the same decision (and went with the ball shifter).

Strictly from an analytic standpoint I like the gear ratio spread on the Ball Shifter better than the Sonic Shifter. The ratios aren't too different, but I like the closer ratio of the Ball Shifter.

The Ball Shifter includes the shifting air cylinder, whereas the Sonic Shifter does not. You will have to add $20-$30 onto the price tag of the Sonic Shifter if you plan on shifting penumatically. On the other hand, if you do not plan on having any pneumatic components on your robot otherwise, the servo shifting of the Sonic Shifter becomes very appealing.

The Ball Shifter has options for Greyhill and US Digital encoders, whereas the Sonic Shifter appears to only have provisions for US Digital encoders (though it's not explicitly specified). If you plan on using Greyhill encoders, this is certainly something to consider.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.