Thread: Drill couplings
View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-02-2003, 14:50
Madison's Avatar
Madison Madison is offline
Dancing through life...
FRC #0488 (Xbot)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,243
Madison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1/2 - 20 please...

Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Johnson
I am quite certain that the thread on OD of the 1/2 inch drill we have in the kit this year is 1/2 - 20 (not 1/2-16 as stated above).
Joe, are you super-duper-absolutely-without-a-doubt certain about this?

I ask for two reasons. . . first, and most importantly, I specified 1/2-16 in my drawings for a shaft coupling. Our machinist did a cursory analysis of the shaft output, too, because he didn't believe me, and agreed it was 1/2-16.

I took that information, perhaps erroneously, from FIRST's provided Virtual Kit of Parts. On the drill motor model provided for Inventor, the thread was 1/2-16.

Did Autodesk mess something up?

Edit: I just double checked, and the Autodesk model definitely reads 1/2-16. I understand it's easy for someone to slip on something like that, though. The search continues.

Edit #2: According to the model of the drill coupling, it's a 1/2-20, like Joe said. Grr. I should've double checked this. Autodesk should have, too. Thanks for bringing that to my attention, Joe. A lot. You could have just saved the day.
__________________
--Madison--

...down at the Ozdust!

Like a grand and miraculous spaceship, our planet has sailed through the universe of time. And for a brief moment, we have been among its many passengers.

Last edited by Madison : 06-02-2003 at 15:15.
Reply With Quote