View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-10-2013, 15:26
dag0620 dag0620 is offline
Because we're FiNE
AKA: David Givens
FRC #1071 (Team MAX)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 784
dag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged-Standard District Point Structure

I'm mostly okay with this system, and glad to see we have a uniformed system. I'm still going through and analyzing, however there is one thing I am strongly against that did pop out.

Quote:
 Regional Participation
District Teams do not earn points for their actions at any Regionals they may attend, but are still eligible for Team
awards at those events, and any benefits that may go along with winning those awards, such as earning their way to the
FIRST Championship. However, if a District Team does earn a slot at the FIRST Championship while attending a Regional
event, that slot does count against the total Championship allocation the District is receiving for the season.
(Emphasis Mine.)

I don't think this is exactly a fair system. I personally believe that a District's allotment of teams should not be affected by it's teams earning slots at events outside of that District's competition structure.

I hope FIRST might consider changing that policy going forward.

Edit: Chris most of wrote his post while I was working on mine as I didn't see it before posting. Never the less I hope me brining this up adds to the point that this particular policy should be revisited.
__________________
David Givens
Alumnus Team Max 1071 ('13) | FIRST Volunteer | NE FIRST

Away making magic for a bit...

Last edited by dag0620 : 31-10-2013 at 15:31.
Reply With Quote