View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-11-2013, 08:39
Foster Foster is offline
Engineering Program Management
VRC #8081 (STEMRobotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,392
Foster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond reputeFoster has a reputation beyond repute
Event box scores

I'm always interested in ways to present data in the most concise fashion that lets people extract information for their own use. I've followed the work of Edward Tufte, he has written some amazing books on the display of quantitative information.

Which brings me to today's topic, robotic event box scores. We've all seen sports box scores that give the full information about a contest at a quick glance.

We have our own:

1. 225, 341, 304, 4637 W
2. 1676, 222, 2607, 224 QF
3. 1168, 272, 1712, 3929 QF
4. 1640, 1626, 2539, 708 QF
5. 2729, 11, 1403, 834 SF
6. 1218, 4575, 484, 4281 SF
7. 2016, 3314, 369, 1923 F
8. 365, 316, 869, 423 QF

(sample from Ramp Riot 2013, thanks Ben Martin!)

Because we know how the alliances are selected, we know how teams were selected. We also know who placed where to some extent. We don't know the real details, unless we get this:

1 beat 8 in 2 matches
5 beat 4 in 2 matches
7 beat 2 in 2 matches
6 beat 3 in 2 matches

1 beat 5 in 3 matches
7 beat 6 in 2 matches

1 beat 7 in 2 matches

I'm looking for a way to add the match info to the short summary

Like:
1. 225, 341, 304, 4637 W (2,3,2)
2. 1676, 222, 2607, 224 QF
3. 1168, 272, 1712, 3929 QF
4. 1640, 1626, 2539, 708 QF
5. 2729, 11, 1403, 834 SF (2)
6. 1218, 4575, 484, 4281 SF (2)
7. 2016, 3314, 369, 1923 F (2,2)
8. 365, 316, 869, 423 QF

If you have 1 number at the end on your alliance, you won your quarter final in X matches. If you have a second number, that's how many matches it took in the Semi's. Three is the winner and how many matches their march to victory took.

Since the elimination tree is always the same, we know that 1v8, 2v7, etc for the quarter finals. So figuring their match ups are easy.

Is there a better way to represent this data? Is there missing data that would be helpful? For example would it be worth know in the top 8 seeds? And given just the data shown, could you reconstruct the eliminations?
__________________
Foster - VEX Delaware - 17 teams -- Chief Roboteer STEMRobotics.org
2010 - Mentor of the Year - VEX Clean Sweep World Championship
2006-2016, a decade of doing VEX, time really flies while having fun
Downingtown Area Robotics Web site and VEXMen Team Site come see what we can do for you.
Reply With Quote