New proposal (fake data)
1. 225(1), 341(3), 304, 4637 W [2,3,2]
2. 1676(2), 222, 2607, 224 QF
3. 1168(4), 272, 1712, 3929 QF
4. 1640(5), 1626, 2539, 708 QF
5. 2729(6), 11(7), 1403, 834 SF [2]
6. 1218(8/5), 4575, 484, 4281 SF [2]
7. 2016(9), 3314, 369, 1923 F [2,2]
8. 365(10), 316, 869, 423 QF
Note 6, it shows that team 1218 was the 8th seed, and declined the 5th alliance. Trying to stay minimal, could be:
6. 1218(8D5), 4575, 484, 4281 SF [2]
6. 1218(8X5), 4575, 484, 4281 SF [2]
Quote:
|
The other thing that's not given and probably impossible to put in such a small format is match score. For all other sports that's one of the most important items.
|
I'm spazzing out on sports that play mini-matches. I know tennis, best out of three, so the scores for the final match could be presented as:
1. 225(1), 341(3), 304, 4637 W [2,3,2] 72-65, 84-83
2. 1676(2), 222, 2607, 224 QF
3. 1168(4), 272, 1712, 3929 QF
4. 1640(5), 1626, 2539, 708 QF
5. 2729(6), 11(7), 1403, 834 SF [2]
6. 1218(8/5), 4575, 484, 4281 SF [2]
7. 2016(9), 3314, 369, 1923 F [2,2]
8. 365(10), 316, 869, 423 QF
Not sure that it would be worth to do all the eliminations, it's starting to get long.