Quote:
Originally Posted by PVCpirate
I remember someone saying that the divisions used to go by team number, like team 1 in Archimedes, team 11 in Galileo, 20 in Curie, 25 in Newton and then repeating. I don't think we know for sure what it is now, but I think someone might know what year they stopped doing the old one.
|
I have no idea what their sorting algorithm is (I took a crack at figuring it out once and got nowhere). But I can tell you what I'd do if I had to solve that problem. I'd generate some random divisions and see if they looked approximately balanced. I'd be looking for balance in several ways: competitive teams, former champions, Hall of Fame teams, rookies, waitlist teams, etc. If it looked too imbalanced or had a division that was too similar to the previous year or two, I'd throw it out and keep doing random ones until I got one that looked good. That would make the "algorithm" pretty hard to solve.