I prefer GRUB2 Too! However, my family likes Windows Boot Mgr, because they aren't so tech savvy
. I loved Grub 2 when I had it
. It, indeed, is quite customizable, and does everything it claims quite well
! As many people have said before, it is very easy to operate on and get things running smoothly. Corrupting your BSD in Win. Boot Mgr. is hard to fix because you need to reinstall Windows
. However, GRUB 2 just requires you to edit a text file or so to configure it, meaning you can bring your computer back to life. I also like how it has so many features and how it actually has color, as compared to the Windows Boot Manager.
In short, there are many boot-loaders out there, today, being developed. I use the Windows Boot Manager because I am basically locked into using it. However, I would suggest Grub 2 because, if I understand correctly, you want to multiboot many operating systems.
If you manage to break the bootloader configuration, it is many times easier to fix it in Grub, as compared to Windows. However, I am talking about Win 7. Win 8 Boot manager is completely different!
You need to add many operating systems. That means that you would want to be able to add and remove operating systems with ease, not worrying abouy damaging your MBR!
In short, Go GRUB2!!!
Also, has anyone tried a different boot manager like Burg (Grub Backwards?
)? How was it? Was it easy to use/worth getting?
Guys, this is just my opinion on what I have used before.