View Single Post
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-12-2013, 22:00
ehfeinberg's Avatar
ehfeinberg ehfeinberg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Evan
FRC #0449 (Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 232
ehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant future
Re: Announcing the 2013 December Design Competition

Quote:
Originally Posted by echin View Post
Where does the -2 come from? It says "3 * (number of crates stacked above 2). Any stack under 3 crates tall will count as 0 points." Therefore, 3 crates would count as 9 points because 3 is above 2.
I think this is stems from confusing language in the actual manual. "3 * (number of crates stacked above 2)." I read it to be 3 * the additional crates stacked above 2. So if it is a 3 crate stack, it would be 3 * 1 (because 3 is one more than 2) = 3. However, I now see how you can read it the other way.

If this is the case, I would take back saying that stacking is a non-factor and amend the statement to say stacking is not the most effective way to score.
__________________
“They’ve done studies, you know. 60 percent of the time, it works every time.” — Brian Fantana
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take." - Wayne Gretzky
"Simplicity is the ultimate form of sophistication" - Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote