View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-12-2013, 19:06
RyanCahoon's Avatar
RyanCahoon RyanCahoon is offline
Disassembling my prior presumptions
FRC #0766 (M-A Bears)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Mountain View
Posts: 689
RyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond reputeRyanCahoon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Our prototype drive chasis(only weighs 27lbs!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flak-Bait View Post
Is it more agile than a mecanum drive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
In the forward direction mecanums will go the same speed as a standard wheel (neglecting parasitic losses due to roller axial free play and carpet stretching which causes the rollers to spin). Omni will go sqrt(2) faster due to the 45 degree angle.
Do mecanums correspondingly have sqrt(2) more torque than an omni setup with the same mechanical advantage? Or are mecanums that much less efficient?

If it's just a matter of mecanums essentially having more mechanical advantage, then this doesn't answer the question of one being more agile, as the same characteristics could be got by changing the gear ratio of one or the other. (not a criticism against your answer, just saying there's more discussion to be had)
__________________
FRC 2046, 2007-2008, Student member
FRC 1708, 2009-2012, College mentor; 2013-2014, Mentor
FRC 766, 2015-, Mentor
Reply With Quote