View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-12-2013, 15:12
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,100
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Omni vs Mecanum CoF ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpetilli View Post
Okay, so then if I increase the gear ratio by sqrt(2)/2 to increase the available torque for the Omni-wheel drive, it should match the pushing force and traction of the mecanum
To a first approximation. Keep in mind that friction in the rollers reduces the available forward pushing force of omni, but increases the available forward pushing force of mec: roller friction causes an omni to lose traction but causes a mec to gain traction (in the forward direction). See the second-to-last paragraph on Page3 of this document.

Quote:
If I build an asymmetric Killough with wheels at 30deg, I get 22% more forward torque and traction (0.866 vs. 0.707)
Decreasing the toe-in angle of omni indeed increases the forward force (for a given wheel torque), and the available traction.