View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2013, 09:08
PhilBot's Avatar
PhilBot PhilBot is offline
Get a life? This IS my life!
AKA: Phil Malone
FRC #1629 (GaCo: The Garrett Coalition)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 747
PhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FTC]: Tetrix motor controller weirdness with 4 motors

Quote:
Originally Posted by aklego View Post
I would agree except that it would do it when the motors were unloaded, i.e the robot was up on blocks just spinning it's wheels. What is completely puzzling to me is that this is a pretty standard FTC configuration..
My experience is that rapidly reversing motors causes worse than Stall-like power consumption. Instead of the Back EMF apposing current flow (like in normal operation), when you rapidly reverse, it augment the applied voltage with no way for the motor to instantly reverse rotation, so for a moment you have twice the voltage applied to the pure resistance of the coils. So this action can invoke stall-like issues in motor controllers (I've seen it blow out a motor controller chip on another system, with no load on the motors).

So, continue down the overload diagnostic path.

I'd consider swapping out that motor controller. It's possible that it has a partial failure that prevents if from dealing with a full over-load.

Phil.
__________________
Phil Malone
Garrett Engineering And Robotics Society (GEARS) founder.
http://www.GEARSinc.org

FRC1629 Mentor, FTC2818 Coach, FTC4240 Mentor, FLL NeXTGEN Mentor
Reply With Quote