Quote:
Originally Posted by magnets
Not true. Aluminum (as a generalization for FRC, you can find exceptions) has a significantly higher strength to weight than steel. In fact, for shafts/gears, your 7075 aluminum is both lighter and stronger that the common stainless steels places like andymark use. In terms of ultimate yield strength, aluminum is roughly 1/3 the weight and almost twice as strong.
|
It's also a more expensive. Something else to note is that steel generally is more stiff than aluminum per unit weight. When you're building something like a bridge, those two factors can be important.
The real reason aluminum is thought of as lighter (for FRC purposes) is that we rarely design on weight, we usually design on size. There's a lot of arbitrary standards in FRC (1/4" thick bearings, 20 DP gears, 2x1 tubing, etc) where stuff just needs to be that big to conform to a standard. Your WCD will be a ton harder to design if you choose .75x.75 steel tubing vs alu 2x1, for example. Also, for stuff like shafts, aluminum (especially 7075) usually has an adequate total yield strength, and since the shaft needs to be 1/2" hex, the alu will be a lot lighter than steel. In other places, we need certain plate thickenesses to get the right number of threads in a tapped hope. Again, steel will be heavier because we just care about overall thickness, not strength. Of course, if we designed all our parts to just be a certain strength, steel and aluminum would be a lot more comparable in terms of weight.
Sure, we could crazily pocket steel or change our FRC wide standards to conform to steel robots. But until then, the lower density of aluminum and comparable strength will make it seen lighter for FRC purposes.