View Single Post
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-12-2013, 12:49
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot Design: If there isn't a vote, who makes the decisions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by seg9585 View Post
Numbers in a design matrix should not be very arbitrary. If you can clearly rank attributes of designs then do so, if not then mark them with the same value. Establish a tolerance level (ie 50 pts +/- 4) and anything within that tolerance is a valid design which may be prototyped/implemented. Pick one of these or add a tiebreaker attribute.
The problem is that many of the attributes you wish to compare are not easily quantifiable. "Reliability" is not an element of a metric space. It is useful to attempt to quantify these so you can do a rough estimation of a utility calculation, but I would never take that as anything more than a guide for discussion.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016

Last edited by Oblarg : 19-12-2013 at 12:51.
Reply With Quote